If It Feels Right to Me, It Must Be Right: A Critical Examination of Moral Subjectivism

By Monica M

           


              One dominant thought in the present world that any philosopher would recognize is moral subjectivism. This idea posits that something is morally right if it feels right to the individual. However, this philosophy of life can be dangerous and poses a threat to society. While someone alone on an island might live with this idea without issue, we all live in families or, at the very least, in societies. We necessarily interact with different kinds of people, encountering those who hold opinions that differ from our own. Another factor that makes living with moral subjectivism difficult is the indeterminate nature of our feelings. We do not have the same feelings all the time. What I felt was right when I was small is completely different from what I believe now, and the things I did as a youth thinking they were right are now actions I regret. This highlights a clear lack of reliability in moral subjectivism.So, why are so many attracted to this way of life? It is because life becomes much easier without the effort required to discipline oneself. There is a natural tendency for people to think something is right simply because it feels right. However, as human beings reach higher levels of maturity, they take further steps to reflect on what they feel is right. It is this step that makes all the difference. Even though reflection does not always guarantee that one is right, it is the preferable approach when considering the greater good of society rather than just individual good. 

        There are also moments in our lives where we reflect and believe we did the right thing, only to later realize that our initial feelings were correct. However, these are exceptions and should not determine or form the basis of our moral judgments. By reflecting and choosing the right thing to do, we contribute positively to society and prosper. Addressing the appeal of moral subjectivism, it's crucial to consider the writings of philosophers like Immanuel Kant, who emphasized duty and universal moral laws over individual feelings, or Aristotle, who highlighted the importance of virtue and rational reflection in achieving moral excellence. These perspectives remind us that ethical living often requires moving beyond subjective preferences to embrace principles that benefit the broader community.In conclusion, while moral subjectivism may simplify life by aligning morality with personal feelings, it lacks reliability and poses risks to societal harmony. Through reflection and considering the greater good, we can make more consistent and beneficial moral choices, contributing to a more cohesive and flourishing society.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Origins of Philosophy: A Global Mystery

By Monica M
Image
                       One of the questions that has long haunted philosophers is: where did philosophy originate? Was it in Greece, India, China, or some other place? The term "philosophy," as we understand it today, was no doubt born in Greece, evident by its very etymology. But the question concerns not the term "philosophy" but the act of doing philosophy. Extensive studies of Ancient Greek philosophy still fail to pinpoint its origin. Though Thales is often considered the first philosopher (because Aristotle mentions him as the first philosopher in his works), it is obvious he did not begin from nothing.         Many philosophers believe that there was philosophy before him that is not recorded. In Greece, religious beliefs were prevalent, and over time, some people started to think critically and ask, "What if our beliefs are wrong?" This naturally led to discuss...
Read more

Aristotle: The Mastermind Behind Western Philosophy

By Monica M
Image
          In Western philosophy, Aristotle is consistently regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of all time. Known as the teacher of Alexander the Great, Aristotle made profound contributions across a wide range of topics. His writings initially appeared as class notes and lecture materials. Although he studied at Plato's Academy for 20 years and greatly admired Plato, Aristotle did not agree with all of Plato's ideas. He is said to have used Plato's dialogues as textbooks and employed Plato's concepts as a foundation for developing his own philosophy. Aristotle's works are noted for their complexity, subtlety, and rigor. Although he is believed to have written around 200 works, many have unfortunately been lost. Aristotle focused extensively on observation and experimentation, starting his explanations from familiar concepts and progressing to more abstract principles of nature. His contributions span nearly every field of knowledge, and while not all h...
Read more

Balancing Pleasure and Morality: Lessons from John Stuart Mill

By Monica M
Image
       The saying "better to be a Socrates dissatisfied than a pig satisfied" is a paraphrase from the writings of John Stuart Mill, a 19th-century English philosopher. Mill discusses this idea in his work "Utilitarianism," where he argues that higher intellectual and moral pleasures are superior to lower physical pleasures. Mill's point is that it is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied because humans are capable of higher forms of happiness. This concept of Mill's is very relevant in today's world. We live in a society where physical pleasures are promoted and justified. Seeking physical pleasure is considered a basic human nature, even when it goes against morality. So, are we saying that all physical pleasures are bad? No. Physical pleasures that are within our control, for which we are not slaves, and above all, those which do not go against morality can be sought. Not any one of these conditions, but all of these conditions ...
Read more